Previous Page  4 / 30 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 30 Next Page
Page Background

Irish Pensions Magazine Autumn 2016

4

News

Welcome to the Autumn edition of the IAPF pensions magazine. All of our

Committees are back up and running and we have held a number of events

over the last 2 months, including our recent Benefits Conference. It was good

to hear from the Minister for Social Protection, Leo Varadkar, who was able to

take time out of the pre-Budget negotiations to address the large attendance.

It was also good to hear him say that the issue of Universal Pensions will be a

priority after the Budget process has concluded.

The Pensions Authority Consultation on Pensions Reform & Simplification

closed on October 3rd and we made our submission which is available on our

website

here

. We welcome the Consultation and the opportunity to contribute

to it. Some of the changes proposed have the possibility to radically alter the

make-up of the Irish pensions system, and it is important that they are given

careful consideration.

We welcome the acknowledgement of the importance of the role of lay trustees and we have strongly argued

that point since the consultation on trustee qualifications last year. They do need support and good trustees

recognise that. We aim to support trustees as much as possible to carry out their crucial role. Earlier this year

our DC Committee published templates for a DC Risk Register, Trustee Compliance Checklist and Trustee

Conflicts of Interest Log. Our Investment Committee has been publishing a series of Investment Topics to

help trustees get a better understanding of complex issues in order to help them when they discuss those

with their advisers. Our Benefits Committee has published a Wind-up Checklist for DB schemes.

We do believe that there is a need to look at harnessing the benefits of scale within the pensions system and

master trusts are a means of doing that. However we also need to ensure that good, engaged employers

and trustees are encouraged to set high standards in their own schemes. We need to ensure we don’t

redesign the system so that it would become too difficult for good schemes to exist.

It was disappointing that the Consultation didn’t focus on tax issues or the disclosure requirements. We see

both of these as requiring a lot of work if we are to properly simplify the system. We look forward to further

engagement with the Authority and the various Government Departments on this.

The other big issue exercising trustees at present is the continuing increase in the value of DB scheme

liabilities as a result of historically low interest rates. We have had a significant loss of DB schemes in the

last 10 years with the number of active schemes having fallen from just over 1,200 at the end of 2006 to less

than 500 today. The number of active members in those schemes has dropped from 270,000 to 126,000 at

the end of last year.

The schemes that survived have generally done so because of tough decisions and considerable effort and

pain for members and employers. Many employees have seen their benefits reduced, either in payment or

what they can expect to receive when they come to retire. Many employers have had to agree to significant

increases in their contributions to the scheme. So, despite reducing the schemes’ liabilities and increasing

assets (DB assets at the end of 2015 were €71.8bn compared to €39.4bn at the end of 2008), schemes are

continuing to see the value of those liabilities rising because of the link to interest rates. Interest rates

continue to remain low because of the Quantitative Easing policies of Central Banks and it is difficult to see

when and how those policies will end.

The schemes that have survived have done so because of the willingness of workers to sacrifice benefits and

the goodwill of employers to continue to sponsor the schemes. It would be a real tragedy if they were to be

forced to wind up because of the way in which we value the liabilities, rather than focusing on their ability

to pay out benefits over the next 30 or 40 years.

We believe it is time to take a wider look at DB funding and the minimum funding standard basis, and this

is an issue we will be focusing on over the coming week and months.

Jim Foley

Chairperson

Chairperson’s Message